Position Paper on Aviation Noise

As the representative organization of cities that host national and international airports, ARC recognizes aviation as a vital economic driver and a connector of people and goods. However, we also acknowledge that aviation noise is a persistent and significant source of environmental stress and public concern. Our position reflects our commitment to balance economic vitality with quality of life for our residents.

1. Noise is the primary environmental concern for airport regions

We recognize that aircraft noise is consistently the most pressing issue raised by our residents. While other environmental factors like air quality and carbon emissions are important, noise directly affects sleep, learning, mental health, and wellbeing — making it a top priority.

2. Aircraft noise will not disappear – We must deal with it

We acknowledge that even in the not so far horizon of green aviation, aircraft noise cannot be entirely eliminated due to the physical nature of aviation. However, technological advancements, operational changes, and planning measures can significantly mitigate its impact.

We call for:

• Stricter noise performance standards for aircraft

• Smarter flight paths using Performance-Based Navigation (PBN)

• Time-based restrictions (e.g., night curfews or quota systems)

  
  

3. More research is needed

Cities urge stronger support for independent, peer-reviewed research into the health and social impacts of chronic noise exposure near airports. Research must go beyond decibel levels to include factors like duration, time of day, and frequency.

We support collaboration with:

• The European Environment Agency

• All public and private aviation and airport stakeholders

• All public and private research institutes

4. Action is needed across all levels

Effective noise mitigation requires a multi-tiered approach:

• EU level: strong legislative frameworks and funding support

• National level: alignment of transport and health policies

• Airport level: investment in quieter fleets and better community dialogue

• Local level: integration into spatial planning and housing policies

We cities stand ready to act, provided we are given the tools, data, and regulatory backing.

5. Transparency and data access are essential

We call for a robust transparency policy on airport noise:

• Public access to real-time noise monitoring

• Disclosure of noise maps and complaints data

• Clear explanations of airspace changes and operational decisions

This will build trust and reduce misinformation.

6. Meaningful engagement of local communities

Community engagement must move from symbolic consultation to real influence in decisions about noise. Cities must be empowered to:

• Co-develop noise action plans

• Host independent mediation bodies

• Represent residents in airport decision-making forums

Public legitimacy depends on inclusive, fair processes.

In summary:

As the representative of cities and regions that host airports, we believe that sustainable aviation must include the voices of local communities. We are committed to constructive dialogue and innovative solutions, but this must be matched by transparency, regulation, investment, and partnership across all levels of government and the aviation sector.